The non-breaking space adds extra information to the text of the HTML. Conceptually the CSS solution abstracts away the visual styling of the HTML. If email data size isn’t an issue I personally would go with CSS white-space because it’s more correct in the spirit of HTML & CSS. To conclude there’s a couple of weapons to dispose of difficult widows and orphans, and which one you use depends on the situation. When the email gets below 600px the gets hidden and the text then flows as it normally would in a mobile container: because of the ‘anything happens’ will be kept together. It will essentially act like normal text and the isn’t relevant to the desktop experience. What’s happening here is on desktop (anything above 600px) the will act as a normal br and the line will break at that point and the sentence will look exactly like you want it too. You can compare a wide range of life insurance policies on our comparison tables, so you’re safe if anything happens. This is literally what this HTML entity was invented for, borrowed from word processors. Putting a non-breaking space ( ) between words instead of a normal space means it will not break on new lines, as you might have guess from the name. Let’s take a look at the two main ways to manage widows, and a third neat trick. The final few words, “smallest of spaces”, never break across multiple lines. Resize this email and see how the paragraph below “Re-balance your home with green” acts.
Here’s a real world example of Ikea using two different ways to manage widows in a paragraph. In email we’ll usually be dealing with widows - lone words at the end of a paragraph. There are lots of reasons why they’re called bad typography: they look untidy they suddenly end a paragraph they leave a lot of white space between paragraphs. Widows and orphans are typographical terms for when a word is left on its own line at the start or end of a paragraph.
0 kommentar(er)
